Is Liberty Media good for F1?

2022 United States Grand Prix 2022, Sunday – LAT Images

On the 23rd January 2017, Formula One changed. Gone were the days of Bernie Ecclestone and the sport was ushered into a new era under the stewardship of American conglomerate Liberty Media.

Over the past five years, the sport has exploded in popularity and for better or for worse is a different beast to the motorsport series acquired in 2017. Formula One has finally conquered the United States and has amassed a new, youthful following as a result of hit Netflix documentary Drive to Survive.

However, some have doubted the intentions of Liberty Media as they shape F1 into a spectacle constantly providing drama from its relatively humble roots at the airfield which is now Silverstone Circuit. Many changes have been made to F1 from sprint races, the cost cap to adding more and more races to the calendar.

Under Liberty Media’s stewardship, interest in the sport is at an all time high with the group reporting race attendance up 36% from 2019 and social media followers up 23%
year-on-year to 61 million. The new audience from Netflix’s Drive to Survive is a large part of this and has broadened the appeal although this has irked some of the long-standing fans.

Many accuse Liberty Media of prioritising the ‘show’ over the sport with decisions such as many red flags (leading to dramatic standing starts), shaking up the format (action every day of the race weekend) and the events that unfolded on that night in Abu Dhabi.

Whatever your views are on the sporting elements of Liberty Media’s changes, the numbers don’t lie. Viewership is increasing at a notable rate and Formula One’s financial position is strengthening.

In 2021, for the first time in the past six years, Formula One Group made an operating profit with their operating profit margin almost tripling in 2022 – clearly the increased financial opportunities from sponsorships and charging tracks has improved things.

In addition to an improving the profit margins at Formula One, Liberty Media have also increased revenues with the general trend being upward as the growing popularity of the sport has led to greater commercial opportunities with various partners.

(dotted line shows trend)

In addition to bringing more money into the business, Liberty Media have also addressed some of the pre-existing problems with F1 as a commercial operation working to reduce its debts which has translated into a decreasing gearing ratio.

For the purposes of this graph Gearing = Long-Term Liabilities/Capital Employed

The increasing value of F1 is also benefiting its competitors with many of the teams now worth hundreds of millions of dollars themselves and finally offering a return for investors and generating profits.

Overall, I think that Liberty Media has had a positive effect on Formula One. Of course there will be critics and even I think some of the changes Liberty has introduced are questionable but it is irrefutable that they are maximising the asset which is F1 and doing their best to turn around a once ailing sport.


Do comment your thoughts below.

5 responses to “Is Liberty Media good for F1?”

  1. David Sperry aka BigHemi Avatar
    David Sperry aka BigHemi

    Gabriella, you have done a great job of answering the question whether Liberty Media is a good steward of the F1 brand. For those that think that Liberty Media is unfairly sucking money out of the fan base, you have shown that the operating profit margin of LM only moved from the red to the black in 2021. I believe they are doing a fair and honest job of growing the F1 brand and placing it in a solid financial footing.

    There will always be those who disagree with innovations and rule changes, but every sport goes through modifications to keep up with the times and changing fan tastes. For example, in an ancient and traditional sport like tennis, it took until the 1950’s to introduce the tie breaker to speed up the game. This rule change was radical at the time, but is now an accepted and exciting part of the game. Most changes in sport are for the better. Really unpopular ones are usually done away with.

    Thank you for analyzing such a large and complex conglomerate as Liberty Media. Their vast holdings are brought together into only three groups, one being the F1 group. Your finding will be be of comfort to F1 fans who will be reassured they are getting a fair deal from Liberty Media.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yeah, they’re definitely not using F1 as a cash cow, they seem to be trying to make good of it.

      I don’t mind the changes but I think a lot of people aren’t fans. Although they probably just don’t want the sport they’ve watched all their lives meddled with.

      Thanks, I only did the F1 part (it’s a separate company listed on the stock exchange – long story) as I originally planned to do a mini series on all the aspects of Liberty Media but the way the Americans do their accounts is different to us and it takes me a lot longer to find everything and work out what the numbers (with different labels) tell me. Normally I know exactly where each thing is on the page and don’t really need to look. This is also my most-read article to date (nearly 600 views) so thanks for the idea. 🙂

      Like

      1. David Sperry aka BigHemi Avatar
        David Sperry aka BigHemi

        Just to feel I owned part of F1, I bought a few shares of the F1 Group tracking stock, FWONA. It roughly doubled in five years but it’s a small amount. The thick financial section in the Liberty Media annual report is barely understandable.

        Your post is perfect for Race Director…F1+Business. Would you mind?

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Your artic

        Like

  2. […] will have less work to do on MotoGP then when they acquired Formula One in 2017 (which led to a great albeit controversial turnaround) but as I know very little about MotoGP (and don’t profess to do so) I won’t go into […]

    Like

Leave a comment